Posted to The Age (27/4/2014) on 27/4/2014 at 12:44 PM
Commenting on "Grading system for schools gets a fail from Australian Council for Education Research"
http://www.theage.com.au/national/education/grading-system-for-schools-gets-a-fail-from-australian-council-for-education-research-20140426-37axb.html
Grading MUST stay. Why has Professor Masters a prefix in his name - Professor? It is because of his excellence in certain field, not because he is just a Mr Average.
If a student scores an E, he/she needs to know. More than that, the teachers and parents need to know as well, otherwise only HE can help this student to improve.
It is not only education has grading; almost everything in life has it, including things we eat; performance of athletes; racing cars and drivers; airline, train and cruise tickets; professions etc. What is the reason for Five/Six-star rating in hospitality, or energy savings? Why do national security rate people as high risk or low risk? Why are there different salary levels at workplace?
I still take keen interest in this subject, even though I am a victim of the education system (that's a different story). I consider myself an educator for about 2 decades, who dislike and protested on many occasions the Competency Based Training (CBT) "grading" in TAFE. Students (trainees) are awarded Competent (C) or Not Yet Competent (NYC). This is not sufficient for some universities to assess whether the student satisfies the entry requirement.
There is a disincentive for top students to excel, and in the meantime encourages the less than average just work slightly harder to cross the finishing line.
It is totally unfair and discriminatory to slow down the smart students in order to wait for the slow one to catch up. Every individual's intellect is different, and it is unwise to hide it or brush over it. Each class assessment is a diagnostic tool, and why wait until it is too late to repair the damage, or hold back those who can proceed to something more challenging?
Good students need encouragement!
Commenting on "Grading system for schools gets a fail from Australian Council for Education Research"
http://www.theage.com.au/national/education/grading-system-for-schools-gets-a-fail-from-australian-council-for-education-research-20140426-37axb.html
Grading MUST stay. Why has Professor Masters a prefix in his name - Professor? It is because of his excellence in certain field, not because he is just a Mr Average.
If a student scores an E, he/she needs to know. More than that, the teachers and parents need to know as well, otherwise only HE can help this student to improve.
It is not only education has grading; almost everything in life has it, including things we eat; performance of athletes; racing cars and drivers; airline, train and cruise tickets; professions etc. What is the reason for Five/Six-star rating in hospitality, or energy savings? Why do national security rate people as high risk or low risk? Why are there different salary levels at workplace?
I still take keen interest in this subject, even though I am a victim of the education system (that's a different story). I consider myself an educator for about 2 decades, who dislike and protested on many occasions the Competency Based Training (CBT) "grading" in TAFE. Students (trainees) are awarded Competent (C) or Not Yet Competent (NYC). This is not sufficient for some universities to assess whether the student satisfies the entry requirement.
There is a disincentive for top students to excel, and in the meantime encourages the less than average just work slightly harder to cross the finishing line.
It is totally unfair and discriminatory to slow down the smart students in order to wait for the slow one to catch up. Every individual's intellect is different, and it is unwise to hide it or brush over it. Each class assessment is a diagnostic tool, and why wait until it is too late to repair the damage, or hold back those who can proceed to something more challenging?
Good students need encouragement!