Navy Seals reveal truth about raid against Osama Bin Laden

Posted to Perth Now (6/11/2011) on 8/11/2011 at 4:33 AM
Commenting on "Navy Seals reveal truth about raid against Osama Bin Laden"
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/top-stories/navy-seals-speak-out-how-we-killed-bert-laden/comments-e6frg12l-1226186932206

Is this an act of an eye for an eye? So what's going to happen to the US Navy Seals who killed Bin Laden? When is the killing cycle going to end? Is the world going to be a better and safer place after the three "evils" are killed (I intentionally not to use the word gone)? As long as hatred and suspicion continue to propagate, the human world is no different from the one roamed by animals which kill their prey by instinct.

Musharraf: Obama is arrogant

Posted to CNN (27/5/2011) on 29/5/2011 at 1:06 AM
Commenting on “Musharraf: Obama is arrogant”
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/05/27/pakistan.musharraf.obama/index.html

I'm definitely NOT sympathetic towards any terrorists or anyone who takes human lives cold-bloodedly. The way the mission was conducted was a violation of Pakistan’s sovereign right. If that could take place in Pakistan, it can happen to any other country in the future. It defeats the purpose of having national constitution, law and order.

American anger at 'arrogant' Europeans' muted reaction to Bin Laden killing

Posted to Daily Mail (5/5/2011) on 6/5/2011
Commenting on “'Cheese-eating surrender monkeys': American anger at 'arrogant' Europeans' muted reaction to Bin Laden killing”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1383802/Cheese-eating-surrender-monkeys-U-S-bloggers-slam-Europeans-muted-reaction-Bin-Laden-killing.html

Posted to Daily Mail (5/5/2011) on 6/5/2011 at 1:33 AM
Was it a coincidence that the President of the United States of America, British strongest ally, was not invited to the wedding of Prince William and Catherine, and that the mission to kill Bin Laden was conducted after the world’s grandest occasion? The British Monarch and the family along with millions of people around the world would be up in arms (not military one) if the death of Bin Laden were to overshadow the wedding ceremony and celebration.

Posted to Daily Mail (5/5/2011) on 6/5/2011 at 1:39 AM
How can we be sure that Bin Laden’s body is at the bottom of the sea, presumably consumed by some sea creatures? Is this just another mystery as intriguing as the Roswell aliens?

Posted to Daily Mail (5/5/2011) on 6/5/2011 at 1:40 AM (not published)
I'm definitely NOT sympathetic towards any terrorists or anyone who takes human lives cold-bloodedly. The way the mission was conducted was a violation of Pakistan’s sovereign right. If that could take place in Pakistan, it can happen to any other country in the future. It defeats the purpose of having national constitution, law and order.

Presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial. We have never heard authenticated recordings about his admission of his masterminding the 9/11 disaster. Now that he is dead, so the world has been told, there is no way to hear his confession in person, or prove each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

Posted to Daily Mail (5/5/2011) on 6/5/2011 at 1:41 AM (not published)
If bin Laden's daughter witnessed her father and mother being killed unarmed, do you expect them not to take revenge? So, when is the world going to have peace? If the Pakistani's sovereign right is violated, and it seems other countries experience the same, we can be next. Military people or secret agents going round shooting civilians unintentionally are just no difference from terrorists. Shoot and kill is not the act of civilised people.

Posted to Daily Mail (5/5/2011) on 6/5/2011 at 1:56 AM
I sincerely hope that peace is restored in countries where wars and fighting are still going on!
Let’s celebrate PEACE, not killing!
Thou shalt not kill ~ Exodus 20:13 - Deuteronomy 5:17
Don’t celebrate when your enemy falls, and don’t take pleasure in his demise. ~Proverbs 24:17

David Stewart would have beat the hell out of Osama bin Laden, then shot him

Posted to Herald Sun (5/5/2011) on 5/5/2011 at 9:13 AM
Commenting on "I would have beat the hell out of Osama bin Laden, then shot him - David Stewart "
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/cia-hints-gruesome-photo-of-dead-osama-bin-laden-could-be-released/story-e6frf7lf-1226050074126

If bin Laden's daughter witnessed her father and mother being killed unarmed, do you expect them not to take revenge? So, when is the world going to have peace? If the Pakistani's sovereign right is violated, and it seems other countries experience the same, we can be next. Military people or secret agents going round shooting civilians unintentionally are just no difference from terrorists. Shoot and kill is not the act of civilised people.

Cut off the head - 1000 Osamas will rise in his place

Posted to Herald Sun (5/5/2011) on 5/5/2011 at 2:15 AM (not published)
Commenting on “Cut off the head - 1000 Osamas will rise in his place”
http://www.monashweekly.com.au/news/world/world/general/cut-off-the-head-1000-osamas-will-rise-in-his-place/2152064.aspx

I'm definitely NOT sympathetic towards any terrorists or anyone who takes human lives cold-bloodedly. The way the mission was conducted was a violation of Pakistan’s sovereign right. If that could take place in Pakistan, it can happen to any other country in the future. It defeats the purpose of having national constitution, law and order.

Geoffrey Robertson QC a specialist in Commonwealth constitutional law, human rights, etc. was interviewed on television and he said that Osama should be brought to trial before a court of justice.

Presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial. We have never heard authenticated recordings about his admission of his masterminding the 9/11 disaster. Now that he is dead, so the world has been told, there is no way to hear his confession in person, or prove each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

David Hicks who was convicted on charges in 2001 of providing material support for terrorism but finally released on 29/12/07 should not have been prosecuted due to political interference in the case by the Bush administration in the United States and the Howard government in Australia.

Osama bin Laden's death is not time to party

Posted to Herald Sun (4/5/2011) on 4/5/2011 at 2:38 PM (not published)
Commenting on “Osama bin Laden's death is not time to party”
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/this-is-not-a-time-to-party/story-e6frfhqf-1226049441564

Was it a coincidence that the President of the United States of America, British strongest ally, was not invited to the wedding of Prince William and Catherine, and that the mission to kill Bin Laden was conducted after the world’s grandest occasion? The British Monarch and the family along with millions of people around the world would be up in arms (not military one) if the death of Bin Laden were to overshadow the wedding ceremony and celebration.

How can we be sure that Bin Laden’s body is at the bottom of the sea, or presumably has been consumed by some sea creatures? This is just another mystery as intriguing as the Roswell aliens.

Presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial. We have never heard authenticated recordings about his admission of his masterminding the 9/11 disaster. Now that he is dead, so the world has been told, there is no way to hear his confession in person, or prove each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

Closer to home, David Hicks who was convicted on charges in 2001 of providing material support for terrorism but finally released on 29 December 2007 should not have been prosecuted due to political interference in the case by the Bush administration in the United States and the Howard government in Australia.

1 May 2011 is a sad day for legal and judiciary systems for countries including Australia who celebrated Osama Bin Laden’s death.