More than vows. Why gay marriage matters

Posted to The Age (31/5/2015) on 31/5/2015 at 6:57 PM
Commenting on "More than vows. Why gay marriage matters"
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/more-than-vows-why-gay-marriage-matters-20150530-ghc43j

No, marriage must NOT be just simply redefined as between union of two people. If the word is to be mucked around with, the word "incest" will disappear, because marriage will extend to a father or mother with his or her offspring, between siblings, or even grandparents, uncles, nephews, nieces, etc.

Civilisation did not happen overnight, and moral code set was not defined just yesterday. There must be a good reason for marriage to be union of different sexes. If children are born in laboratories, then human beings must as well have robots to be their offsprings, who don't require a couple millions of dollars to raise them through to graduate from university.

If I have a chance to stand at a podium to address a group of children from same sex parents, I shall encourage them to sue their so called parents for depriving them the basic human right of having a father and mother.

Having the aborigines to be inclusive in the Australian society, as an example, is totally different from accepting same sex marriage. The argument is nonsensical, and it is absolute garbage to say the least.

People call for government research funding to find way to help people suffering from genetic problems, and yet no one has ever raise doubt that people trapped in opposite gender body is genetic malfunction, and in the worst case, it may be a sign of silent evolution in progress.

We cannot simply accept this and sweep the matter under the carpet. Like what professor Julius Miller used to ask, "why is it so?"

Penny Wong reveals why she betrayed Julia Gillard

Posted to Herald Sun (29/6/2013) on 29/6/2013 at 12:40 PM (not published by Newspaper)
Commenting on "Penny Wong reveals why she betrayed Julia Gillard"
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/penny-wong-reveals-why-she-betrayed-julia-gillard/story-e6frf7jo-1226671770803

It is interesting to note that Penny Wong, former Finance Minister under the Gillard's government, has switched camp and landed in the position as the Leader of Senate. Penny Wong's survival is a very smart and strategic move by Kevin Rudd. Penny Wong is an Asian-born (Sabahian), lesbian female. She is the best tool for killing three birds (race, gay, gender) with one penny.

Recycled Rudd: Will he be better the second time around?

Posted to CNN (27/6/2013) on 27/6/2013 at 11:10 PM
Commenting on "Recycled Rudd: Will he be better the second time around?"
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/06/27/world/asia/australia-rudd/index.html

Liberal will win the next election, but Labor will put up a good contest under Kevin Rudd. The damage caused by former Prime Minister Julia Gillard will take time to heal.

There are several unfilled key positions, but under Kevin Rudd's wing is a team of inexperienced Gen Y MP's, due to resignations of the Julia Gillard's supporters and those sacked by Julia Gillard who supported Kevin Rudd in the previous showdown.

For Australia's sake, Labor must not win the election, or else Australia will enter an era of financial crisis. Not unlike Julia Gillard, both spent money like no tomorrow.

Kevin Rudd is the 26th and 28th Prime Minister. In his previous PM life, he demonstrated that he was a workaholic which earned him the title Kevin 24/7 with a management style dreaded by his staff. In fact, the PM office had extremely high staff turnover.

Kevin Rudd is a good communicator, but then talk is cheap. He has many Twitter followers, and speaks Mandarin very fluently. His smiling baby face is likeable especially adored by seniors, but this is a facade of "hiding a knife behind the smiling face" (36 Stratagems).

Fixed carbon pricing may be the first item thrown out of Julia Gillard's window and replaced by emission trading scheme (ETS), a more unethical way to reduce carbon emission. This is one of the tactic known in the 36 stratagems as "kill with a borrowed knife".

Gonski funding model for schools seems like a fair system, but it will not fix the real problems. Billions of dollars will be misused by schools and principals, not dissimilar to some of the Labor government funded projects. The core problem must be tackled, and the education system must undergo a complete revamping from early childhood learning to tertiary education.

It is interesting to note that Penny Wong, former Finance Minister under the Gillard's government, has switched camp and landed in the position as the Leader of Senate. Penny Wong's survival is a very smart and strategic move by Kevin Rudd. Penny Wong is an Asian-born (Sabahian), lesbian female. She is the best tool for killing three birds (race, gay, gender) with one penny.

After historic court rulings, what's next for gay rights movement?

Posted to CNN (26/6/2013) on 26/6/2013 at 11:33 PM
Commenting on "After historic court rulings, what's next for gay rights movement?"
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/06/27/us/gay-rights-whats-next/index.html

I believe same gender marriage is NOT about equality or the right of individuals. Change of definition of the word marriage is not just a political matter, or legal matter. It affects the moral fibre, cultural, societal and family structures, which can be damaged beyond repair.

The argument to the nth degree will be marriage between siblings from the same biological parents, father with daughter or mother with son. To continue further with the argument, father with son, and mother with daughter. If a parent marries a child and the female bears a child, is the child the grandchild or the child of the senior partner?

Rules are human-made (just for political correctness) and morality is human-defined. Obviously, these can all be changed if so desire. The questions need to be asked are "should this be changed", "what can this lead to", and "where is the boundary".

The Pope did not like this Benetton image

Posted to Nine MSN (18/11/2011) on 18/11/2011 at 8:39 PM (Not published by Newspaper)
Commenting on "The Pope did not like this Benetton image"
http://grazia.ninemsn.com.au/blog.aspx?blogentryid=953267&showcomments=true

Whoever came up with that idea must be a very sick cookie. This is distasteful to the nth degree. The so-called "symbolic images of reconciliation" can create more divides than what was intended. The provocative photoshopped trash conjures up two gay men in action, which I find unacceptable and repulsive. I do sincerely hope that not only the Pope but also the affected world leaders take legal action against Benetton for such devious perversions.

Bob Katter's gay brother speaks out

Posted to Herald Sun (24/8/2011) on 24/8/2011 at 4:26 AM (Not published by Newspaper)
Commenting on "Bob Katter's gay brother speaks out"
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/bob-katters-gay-brother-speaks-out/story-fn7x8me2-1226120710520

Posted to Herald Sun (24/8/2011) on 24/8/2011 at 6:58 PM
Commenting on "Gay marriage about the 'powerful force' of love says Greens MP"
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/gay-marriage-about-the-powerful-force-of-love-says-greens-mp/comments-fn7x8me2-1226121110331

It is not a matter of redefining the word marriage, or anyone being out of touch with the millions of Australians or people all over the world, it is a matter whether human beings should change their mindset and accept robotic and laboratory-produce offspring.

I am not a believer of creationism, but I believe that the existence of men and women on this planet is to enable the human species to propagate. So many people worry about global warming, rise in sea levels, big tsunamis, monstrous earthquake and all sort of disasters; not that they are concerned about the planet Earth being destroyed but more so about the extinction of human race. If so, doesn't same sex marriage fall into the same catastrophic category of disaster that can cause human annihilation?

Somehow a line must be drawn on the sand where complex relationship ceases to go beyond and morality cuts in, no matter how much and deep the love is.

Many people jump onto the band wagon about human rights. "Children" of same sex couples have their human rights stripped off from the day the female eggs being fertilised by a sperm each. Shouldn't a child have the right to have a legally recognised male father and female mother?