666;">Commenting on "

Posted to The Age (4/7/2015) on 4/7/2015 at 9:04 PM
Commenting on "Labor senator Penny Wong slams language around same-sex marriage"
http://www.theage.com.au/national/labor-senator-penny-wong-slams-language-around-samesex-marriage-20150704-gi54ee.html

What seems to be trivial today may become a reality tomorrow. Passing this bill on same-sex marriage sets a precedence for lobbyists campaigning for recognition of other forms of marriage in the name of marriage equality, e.g. polygamy and incest.

You probably know that a male Muslim can take in four to five wives, but a female Muslim cannot have more than one husband. If the law were to allow same-sex marriage, it is likely that the Muslim community will lobby to recognise the Islamic laws that permit polygamy. That will have a flow-on effect to the non-Muslims, once again in the name of equality.

Incest can have genetic repercussion. Royal families have intermarriage within the same royal blood line so that power remain in the hands of these privileged few. Incest also occurred and recorded in the Bible, in cases where those concerned did not want a family tree to be terminated abruptly due to the absence of male offspring within the family. These examples will be used by the believers and non-believers to justify to have sexual relationship with own family members instead of going for adoption, IVF or surrogacy.

The fight for same-sex marriage in Australia is far from over

Posted to The Age (1/7/2915) on 2/7/2015 at 2:19 AM
Commenting on "The fight for same-sex marriage in Australia is far from over"
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/comment-eric-abetz--on-gay-marriage-20150701-gi26gi.html

Marriage is not just about union between two people, but between a male and a female from different families, and not closely blood related, and not of the same sex.

I don't support same sex marriage and this is NOT based on religious ground. To the pass bill is to open the Pandora box, leading to approving incest practices and polygamy. Incest is unacceptable, even such practices occurred in ancient time among royal families, and recorded in the holy book. It has been proven that incest can lead to deformed or disabled offspring, and in serious case early death.

It is nonsensical to argue about marriage equality. There are religious cult leaders taking sexual advantage of their female followers, and marrying them so as to turn them into baby making machines. Should these perverts be recognised and that the society allows them to carry out these immoral acts in the name of equality? Do you approve any religion or practice that endorses a man to have 5 wives, but a woman is not allowed to have more than one husband? Do mistresses have the same right as the wife of a man?

It is NOT up to a few, even by the Judges of highest court in Australia, to decide whether same sex-marriage is a goer. 300,000 people may have gone onto the streets demonstrating their solidarity supporting same sex-marriage, but it is insignificant compared with a few millions not there to voice their opposition.

There are seedless grape and watermelon. Same sex-marriage in fact results in seedless human. It is really sad that babies are made in surgical rooms or laboratories, and the future generation may be wearing tags spelling out where they are made in or produced - e.g. Product of Thailand, made with local and imported ingredients.

More than vows. Why gay marriage matters

Posted to The Age (31/5/2015) on 31/5/2015 at 6:57 PM
Commenting on "More than vows. Why gay marriage matters"
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/more-than-vows-why-gay-marriage-matters-20150530-ghc43j

No, marriage must NOT be just simply redefined as between union of two people. If the word is to be mucked around with, the word "incest" will disappear, because marriage will extend to a father or mother with his or her offspring, between siblings, or even grandparents, uncles, nephews, nieces, etc.

Civilisation did not happen overnight, and moral code set was not defined just yesterday. There must be a good reason for marriage to be union of different sexes. If children are born in laboratories, then human beings must as well have robots to be their offsprings, who don't require a couple millions of dollars to raise them through to graduate from university.

If I have a chance to stand at a podium to address a group of children from same sex parents, I shall encourage them to sue their so called parents for depriving them the basic human right of having a father and mother.

Having the aborigines to be inclusive in the Australian society, as an example, is totally different from accepting same sex marriage. The argument is nonsensical, and it is absolute garbage to say the least.

People call for government research funding to find way to help people suffering from genetic problems, and yet no one has ever raise doubt that people trapped in opposite gender body is genetic malfunction, and in the worst case, it may be a sign of silent evolution in progress.

We cannot simply accept this and sweep the matter under the carpet. Like what professor Julius Miller used to ask, "why is it so?"

Same sex marriage the culture war is over

Posted to The Age (26/4/2014) on 26/4/2013 at 2:12 PM
Commenting on "Same sex marriage the culture war is over"
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/samesex-marriage-the-culture-war-is-over-20130425-2ih50.html

Same gender marriage is the start of something horrific in human history and continuing civilisation. The redefinition of marriage, in the name of rights and equality, has very serious implication and will lead to the legalisation of father marrying his daughter, mother and son, father and son, mother and daughter, and between siblings of either gender from same parents. In these examples, the concern applies only to same biological parents or offspring.

New Zealand can make all the money they want if all those "couples" decide to go there and get married. Hopefully, they take up New Zealand citizenship and never to return to Australia. Australia does not follow many other countries' practices and culture; what so big deal about then not follow this New Zealand's unpalatable law?

Turnbull's gay marriage swipe

Posted to The Age (7/7/2012) on 7/7/2012 at 3:34 AM
Commenting on “Turnbull's gay marriage swipe”
http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/turnbulls-gay-marriage-swipe-20120706-21mou.html

Custody matter is very messy for many divorce opposite-sex couples. After the parents have gone through those very ugly and nasty divorce processes, a lot of the children suffer immense psychological trauma. These are children born as a result of the union of their biological parents. Due to many factors, including holding strong views of uncompromising I’ism and love for materialistic ownership instead of relationship, couples start to drift apart. Unfortunately, the number of divorces is on the increase.

For gay couples, the so-called children are “created” or “conceived” in laboratory and later “implanted” by surgery. The “ownership” of children will always be an issue, either morally or legally. A child of a same sex couple not only has no less than two fathers or two mothers in physical sense, they may have additional father or mother who donates the sperm or egg. The child may also have an additional surrogate mother who carries the embryo. Assuming that statistics does not lie, more than 30% of same sex-couple marriage will end in divorce, and if so, all hell breaks loose when custody is decided upon.

At least one of the same-sex partners has no biological kinship with their “child”, and the parents’ divorce may cause the child’s identity turn upside down. The child may feel betrayed not only by their parents, but also by the society and all the professionals who allow such union and operations to proceed.

Triple J presenters label Julia Gillard a 'whore', Tim Mathieson 'gay'

Posted to The Age (2/12/2011) on 2/12/2001 at 1:56 PM
Commenting on "Triple J presenters label Julia Gillard a 'whore', Tim Mathieson 'gay'"
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/triple-js-stinging-sledge-on-julia-and-tim/story-fn7x8me2-1226212148812

Same sex marriage contradicts what modern human race believes in - back to nature and grows things organic! We don't need GM or laboratory grown living things. Why are human race moving forward in the wrong direction!

PS I can't imagine how these Triple J idiots will respond if their girl friends, sisters or mothers were call whores. Watch your mouths, you have gone too far!

Pincer move on Gillard over gay marriage

Posted to The Age (1/12/2011) on 1/12/2001 at 12:16 PM, 2/12/2011 at 10:35 AM (Not published by Newspaper)
Commenting on "Pincer move on Gillard over gay marriage"
http://www.theage.com.au/national/pincer-move-on-gillard-over-gay-marriage-20111130-1o7bn.html

Same sex marriage contradicts what modern human race believes in - back to nature and grows things organic! We don't need GM or laboratory grown living things. Why are human race moving forward in the wrong direction!

Bob Katter's gay brother speaks out

Posted to Herald Sun (24/8/2011) on 24/8/2011 at 4:26 AM (Not published by Newspaper)
Commenting on "Bob Katter's gay brother speaks out"
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/bob-katters-gay-brother-speaks-out/story-fn7x8me2-1226120710520

Posted to Herald Sun (24/8/2011) on 24/8/2011 at 6:58 PM
Commenting on "Gay marriage about the 'powerful force' of love says Greens MP"
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/gay-marriage-about-the-powerful-force-of-love-says-greens-mp/comments-fn7x8me2-1226121110331

It is not a matter of redefining the word marriage, or anyone being out of touch with the millions of Australians or people all over the world, it is a matter whether human beings should change their mindset and accept robotic and laboratory-produce offspring.

I am not a believer of creationism, but I believe that the existence of men and women on this planet is to enable the human species to propagate. So many people worry about global warming, rise in sea levels, big tsunamis, monstrous earthquake and all sort of disasters; not that they are concerned about the planet Earth being destroyed but more so about the extinction of human race. If so, doesn't same sex marriage fall into the same catastrophic category of disaster that can cause human annihilation?

Somehow a line must be drawn on the sand where complex relationship ceases to go beyond and morality cuts in, no matter how much and deep the love is.

Many people jump onto the band wagon about human rights. "Children" of same sex couples have their human rights stripped off from the day the female eggs being fertilised by a sperm each. Shouldn't a child have the right to have a legally recognised male father and female mother?