Posted to The Age (31/5/2015) on 31/5/2015 at 6:57 PM
Commenting on "More than vows. Why gay marriage matters"
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/more-than-vows-why-gay-marriage-matters-20150530-ghc43j
No, marriage must NOT be just simply redefined as between union of two people. If the word is to be mucked around with, the word "incest" will disappear, because marriage will extend to a father or mother with his or her offspring, between siblings, or even grandparents, uncles, nephews, nieces, etc.
Civilisation did not happen overnight, and moral code set was not defined just yesterday. There must be a good reason for marriage to be union of different sexes. If children are born in laboratories, then human beings must as well have robots to be their offsprings, who don't require a couple millions of dollars to raise them through to graduate from university.
If I have a chance to stand at a podium to address a group of children from same sex parents, I shall encourage them to sue their so called parents for depriving them the basic human right of having a father and mother.
Having the aborigines to be inclusive in the Australian society, as an example, is totally different from accepting same sex marriage. The argument is nonsensical, and it is absolute garbage to say the least.
People call for government research funding to find way to help people suffering from genetic problems, and yet no one has ever raise doubt that people trapped in opposite gender body is genetic malfunction, and in the worst case, it may be a sign of silent evolution in progress.
We cannot simply accept this and sweep the matter under the carpet. Like what professor Julius Miller used to ask, "why is it so?"
Commenting on "More than vows. Why gay marriage matters"
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/more-than-vows-why-gay-marriage-matters-20150530-ghc43j
Civilisation did not happen overnight, and moral code set was not defined just yesterday. There must be a good reason for marriage to be union of different sexes. If children are born in laboratories, then human beings must as well have robots to be their offsprings, who don't require a couple millions of dollars to raise them through to graduate from university.
If I have a chance to stand at a podium to address a group of children from same sex parents, I shall encourage them to sue their so called parents for depriving them the basic human right of having a father and mother.
Having the aborigines to be inclusive in the Australian society, as an example, is totally different from accepting same sex marriage. The argument is nonsensical, and it is absolute garbage to say the least.
People call for government research funding to find way to help people suffering from genetic problems, and yet no one has ever raise doubt that people trapped in opposite gender body is genetic malfunction, and in the worst case, it may be a sign of silent evolution in progress.
We cannot simply accept this and sweep the matter under the carpet. Like what professor Julius Miller used to ask, "why is it so?"
