666;">Commenting on "

Posted to The Age (4/7/2015) on 4/7/2015 at 9:04 PM
Commenting on "Labor senator Penny Wong slams language around same-sex marriage"
http://www.theage.com.au/national/labor-senator-penny-wong-slams-language-around-samesex-marriage-20150704-gi54ee.html

What seems to be trivial today may become a reality tomorrow. Passing this bill on same-sex marriage sets a precedence for lobbyists campaigning for recognition of other forms of marriage in the name of marriage equality, e.g. polygamy and incest.

You probably know that a male Muslim can take in four to five wives, but a female Muslim cannot have more than one husband. If the law were to allow same-sex marriage, it is likely that the Muslim community will lobby to recognise the Islamic laws that permit polygamy. That will have a flow-on effect to the non-Muslims, once again in the name of equality.

Incest can have genetic repercussion. Royal families have intermarriage within the same royal blood line so that power remain in the hands of these privileged few. Incest also occurred and recorded in the Bible, in cases where those concerned did not want a family tree to be terminated abruptly due to the absence of male offspring within the family. These examples will be used by the believers and non-believers to justify to have sexual relationship with own family members instead of going for adoption, IVF or surrogacy.

The fight for same-sex marriage in Australia is far from over

Posted to The Age (1/7/2915) on 2/7/2015 at 2:19 AM
Commenting on "The fight for same-sex marriage in Australia is far from over"
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/comment-eric-abetz--on-gay-marriage-20150701-gi26gi.html

Marriage is not just about union between two people, but between a male and a female from different families, and not closely blood related, and not of the same sex.

I don't support same sex marriage and this is NOT based on religious ground. To the pass bill is to open the Pandora box, leading to approving incest practices and polygamy. Incest is unacceptable, even such practices occurred in ancient time among royal families, and recorded in the holy book. It has been proven that incest can lead to deformed or disabled offspring, and in serious case early death.

It is nonsensical to argue about marriage equality. There are religious cult leaders taking sexual advantage of their female followers, and marrying them so as to turn them into baby making machines. Should these perverts be recognised and that the society allows them to carry out these immoral acts in the name of equality? Do you approve any religion or practice that endorses a man to have 5 wives, but a woman is not allowed to have more than one husband? Do mistresses have the same right as the wife of a man?

It is NOT up to a few, even by the Judges of highest court in Australia, to decide whether same sex-marriage is a goer. 300,000 people may have gone onto the streets demonstrating their solidarity supporting same sex-marriage, but it is insignificant compared with a few millions not there to voice their opposition.

There are seedless grape and watermelon. Same sex-marriage in fact results in seedless human. It is really sad that babies are made in surgical rooms or laboratories, and the future generation may be wearing tags spelling out where they are made in or produced - e.g. Product of Thailand, made with local and imported ingredients.