Posted to The Age (3/11/2014) on 3/11/2014 at 10:35 AM (Not published by newspaper)
Commenting on "It's a noisy world, so scream and let scream"
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/its-a-noisy-world-so-scream-and-let-scream-20141102-11epr4.html
Decades ago, houses were smaller and closer. People were just as tolerant or intolerant depending on how one's take it, but they were different from today's "rights fighters", who are more inconsiderate and selfish. They think it is their God damned right to set free their babies in public places, including on public transport and plane.
Parents claiming innocence for their children's behaviour is not an excuse for deprivation of other's quiet enjoyment, wherever they may be.
Would anyone accept a mentally deranged person running amok or screaming at will at public places, even if a carer or medical personnel is accompanying the person? Who should take responsibility, or should the nuisance be barred from these places where the rights of a lot people should be respected without any prejudice!
Commenting on "It's a noisy world, so scream and let scream"
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/its-a-noisy-world-so-scream-and-let-scream-20141102-11epr4.html
Decades ago, houses were smaller and closer. People were just as tolerant or intolerant depending on how one's take it, but they were different from today's "rights fighters", who are more inconsiderate and selfish. They think it is their God damned right to set free their babies in public places, including on public transport and plane.
Parents claiming innocence for their children's behaviour is not an excuse for deprivation of other's quiet enjoyment, wherever they may be.
Would anyone accept a mentally deranged person running amok or screaming at will at public places, even if a carer or medical personnel is accompanying the person? Who should take responsibility, or should the nuisance be barred from these places where the rights of a lot people should be respected without any prejudice!
